Page 48 - Chip Scale Review_March-April_2024-digital
P. 48

than 80%. Again, this is because of   correlate very well (more than 95%   density and better thermal dissipation
        the thinner packaging enabled by   matched); and 2) the stack thermal   of HBM [13]. The paper’s focus is on
        HCB; additionally, there are no Cu-  resistance fabricated  with  the  HCB   the demonstration of a 8Hi-HBI (hybrid
        pillar with solder cap and underfill/  is 15~30% less than that with the    bonding intercon nect) with C2W
        NCF structures, which increase the   TCB-NCF.                         multi-stack HBM as shown in Figure
        thermal resistance.                                                   6. It can be seen that comparing with
          Figure 5 shows the simulation and   SK Hynix’s hybrid bonding for HBM  the solder-bumped mass reflow method
        measurement results of the 16H HBM   During IEEE/ECTC 2023, SK Hynix   (chapter 1 of [8]), the thickness of the
        package with the HCB and TCB-NCF   presented at least one paper on a   HBM package can be reduced by 15%
        methods. It can be seen that: 1) the   chip-to-wafer (C2W) hybrid bonding   with the Cu-Cu bumpless HBI method.
        simulation and measurement results   interconnect technology for higher   Plasma treatment is a key process
                                                                              step for preparing the bonding surface
                                                                              that makes oxide bonding at room
                                                                              temperature with CMP in HBI. The
                                                                              authors consider three different kinds
                                                                              of plasma conditions, namely, A, B,
                                                                              and  C.  Figure 7 shows the bonding
                                                                              s t r e ng t h a nd s c a n n i ng a c ou s t ic
                                                                              microscopy (SAM) images of samples
                                                                              under plasma conditions A, B, and C
                                                                              after end-of-line and reliability testing.
                                                                              It can be seen that plasma condition
                                                                              B yields the highest bonding strength
                                                                              that is measured by the Maszara test
                                                                              in wafer-to-wafer base. The annealing
                                                                              temperature is 200ºC. There is no void
                                                                              after the end of line. However, there
                                                                              are voids after the reliability test.
                                                                                Thermal  resistances  of  MR+MUF
                                                                              (8Hi) and HBI (8Hi) structures with
                                                                              different pad densities are shown in
                                                                              Figure 8. It can be seen that: 1) for the
                                                                              same pad density (20%), the thermal
                                                                              resistance of the HBI (8Hi) is 22%
                                                                              lower than that of the MR+MUF (8Hi);
                                                                              and 2) the thermal resistance of the
                                                                              HBI (8Hi) (with 8% pad density) is
                                                                              13% lower than that of the MR+MUF
                                                                              (8Hi) (with 20% bump density).

                                                                              Micron’s hybrid bonding for HBM
                                                                                D u r i n g E C T C 20 2 3 , M i c r o n
                                                                              publ ishe d  at  lea st  one  pape r  on
                                                                              critical challenges with copper hybrid
                                                                              bonding for C2W memory stacking
                                                                              [14]. Figure 9a shows a conventional
                                                                              stacking  of  TSV-dies  with  µbumps
                                                                              solder reflow method for HBM. The
                                                                              µbump pitch can go down to 20µm.
                                                            P                 However, with hybrid bonding, the
                                                              RoHS
                                                                              Cu pad pitch can easily go down
                                                                              t o 10 µ m a n d t h e r e i s n o bu m p,
                                                                              i.e., bumpless as shown in  Figure
                                                                              9b.  Figure 9c shows the electron
                                                                              back s c at t er d i f f r ac t ion ( EBSD)
                                                                              across the bonding interface where
                                                                              two Cu pads are joined together. Due
                                                                              to Cu-to-Cu diffusion, these two Cu
                                                                              pads become one with the Cu crystal

        46   Chip Scale Review   March  •  April  •  2024   [ChipScaleReview.com]
        46
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53