Page 42 - ChipScale_May-June_2020-digital
P. 42

+
        55mm 2.5D package used in an artificial   This aids fast Ga  FIB polishing times,   it can be done in areas far away from the
        intelligence application. The inset image   and rapid results are further enabled by a   desired target location. This reduces the risk
        showing 25µm-diameter microbumps was   streamlined single-instrument queue, rather   of preparation artifacts, even in high-stress
        acquired using 1.8µm/voxel. 3D XRM has   than managing two queues of separate tools.  packages containing advanced-node silicon
        become standard in FA labs because of its   The laser-integrated FIB-SEM (laserFIB)   die with ultra-lowK dielectrics.
        ability to image fully intact packages with   represents a new class of FIB-SEM,   The sloped walls produced by the fs-laser
                                                                                          +
        high spatial resolution [5], and state-of-  optimized for imaging targeted features at   ensure the Ga  beam has a short milling
        the-art 3D XRM has a spatial resolution   nanoscale resolutions within SiP and 2.5/3D   path in the z-dimension of this wedge-
                                                                                                              +
        of 500nm with voxel sizes of 40nm [6].   packages. Table 1 shows it is well-suited   shaped edge, enabling efficient local Ga
        The XRM images are helpful to guide   for removing cubic millimeters of material,   FIB polishing and high-resolution imaging
                                                      +
        subsequent cross-sectional scanning   unlike the Xe  plasma FIB (PFIB). Using   across areas of 100µm to 500µm wide
        electron microscope (SEM) analysis.  parameters for high-quality laser-processed   and equal or greater depths. High imaging
          Traditional mechanical cross-section   surfaces, it takes four minutes for the fs-  quality and low maintenance is ensured
        techniques are under pressure to deliver   laser to remove a half cubic millimeter of   by segregating the laser from the FIB-
        artifact-free results at high throughput [7].   silicon, compared to two days for a PFIB or   SEM chamber to avoid contaminating the
                                                        +
        Focused ion beam (FIB) processing, while   15 days for a Ga  FIB at published milling   columns and detectors with ablated and
        having adequate accuracy and quality for the   rates [9].             recast material. Efficient transfer between
        finest-pitch interconnects, lacks efficiency   The time-consuming conventional   chambers enables the repeated cycles of
        for removing large volumes of packaging   cross-section steps of epoxy embedding   laserFIB processing and imaging that may
        material to analyze buried features. To   and mechanical polishing are not used in   be required for new recipe set-up or for
        address these deficiencies, a new instrument,   the laserFIB workflow (Figure 2), and if   analyzing multiple sites in a sample.
        ZEISS Crossbeam laser, was recently   downsizing of larger samples is required,






















        Figure 1: 3D XRM images from three scans of a 55mm x 55mm 2.5D package, showing multiple levels of interconnect, the smallest being 25µm-diameter Cu-pillar microbumps.
        developed. It extends the nanoscale imaging
        and process accuracy of FIB-SEM to
        packages by enabling site-specific removal
        of large volumes of packaging material. It
        includes a fs-laser attached to the external
                               +
        load lock of a gallium ion (Ga ) FIB-SEM,
        delivering an improved workflow for site-
        specific cross-sectional imaging. Integration
                         +
        of a fs-laser and Ga  FIB into a single
        system ensures a streamlined “cut and look”
        workflow for fastest time to results, as well
        as a pristine sample that is not oxidized by
        exposure to atmosphere, thereby enabling
        accurate analysis. The fs-laser interaction is
        essentially athermal [8], producing a laser
        affected zone (LAZ) smaller than 1µm
        under optimized processing conditions.   Table 1: Technology timing comparisons for removal of up to one cubic millimeter of silicon.

        40   Chip Scale Review   May  •  June  •  2020   [ChipScaleReview.com]
        40
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47