Page 15 - Chip Scale Review_January-February_2024-digital
P. 15

Heterogeneous chiplet integration to make megachips


        By Rabindra N. Das, Jason Plant, Alex Wynn, Matthew Ricci, Ryan Johnson, Matthew Stamplis, et al.  [MIT Lincoln Laboratory]
        T        h i s p a p e r d e s c r i b e s a   used to fabricate megachip modules.   chip-to-chip spacing to minimize the




                 new, extremely large area
                                           of megachip buildup layers having
                 integrated circuit (ELAIC)   The present process allows fabrication   interconnect length, on-chip memory,
                                                                              higher bandwidth connections, and
        solution—we are calling a “megachip”—  thicknesses in the range of 1-10µm, which   management for greater heat densities,
        su it able  for combi n i ng mu lt iple   allows packaging structures having   while being pushed into higher I/O
        chiplets of varying type (e.g., memory,   both finer pitch and higher density. The   counts, smaller pitches, and larger
        application-specific integrated circuits   processes and materials used to achieve   footprints [5-6].  This necessarily
        [ASICs], central processing units [CPUs],   smaller feature dimensions, satisfy   drives a requirement for improving the
        graphics processing units [GPUs], power   stringent registration requirements, and   power efficiency of the chip-to-chip
        conditioning) into a single package on a   achieve robust electrical interconnections   I /Os. In addition, new advanced
        common interconnect platform.      are discussed.                     packaging requires low-loss, mixed
          The  megachip  approach helps to                                    material, and versatile construction
        rearchitect heterogeneous chip tiling   Introduction                  to accom mod ate t he complex it y
        for developing highly complex systems   The increasing demand for digital   associated with size, weight, and
        having desired circuit density and   computing, mobility, and connectivity   power (SWaP) optimization.
        performance. Recent work on large-  i s d r iv i ng t he m ic r o ele c t r on ics   Conve nt ion al ly, bet t e r w i r i ng
        area superconducti ng i nteg rated   industry toward cost-driven, highly-  densities have been achieved by
        circuits to join multiple individual   integrated, miniaturized technology   using filled dielectric to reduce via
        die is highlighted in this article,   with increased performance and lower   di mensions, li nes, a nd spaces —
        with particular attention paid to the   power consumption  to bring next-  t h e r e b y  i n c r e a s i n g  t h e  n u m b e r
        processing of the high-density electrical   generation devices into more and more   of ci rcu it laye r s — a nd ut i l i z i ng
        interconnects formed between the   applications [1-2]. Over the last decade,   m i cr ov i a s  fo r  i n t er c o n n ec t io n .
        individual die. A variety of megachip   high-performance computing (HPC)   However, each of these methods has
        a s se mbl ie s we r e fabr icat e d a nd   has evolved to adapt smaller and more   inherent limitations. For example,
        characterized using several techniques   diverse technology nodes suitable for   there are limitations related to laser
        (i.e.,  scanning-electron  microscopy   artificial intelligence (AI), machine   drilling and electroplating of high
        (SEM), optical microscopy, confocal   learning, and embedded computing   aspect ratio blind- and through-vias,
        microscopy, X-ray) to investigate the   p l a t f or m s — t h e s e  a p p l i c a t i on s   increased resistance of narrow (and)
        integration quality, minimum feature   consistently involve trade-offs between   long circuit lines, and increased cost
        size, silicon content, die-to-die spacing,   enabling more compute capability   of fabrication related to additional
        and gap f illing. Silicon dioxide,   versus constraints in volume, weight,   w i r i ng l a ye r s [7 ]. A s a r e s u l t ,
        ben zocyclobutene (BCB), epoxy,    power, and thermal management.     microelectronics packaging is moving
        polyimide, and silicone-based dielectrics   Most of the power consumption   toward alternative, innovative, low-
        were used for gap fill, via formation and   for the above applications is due   cost approaches as solutions for
        redistribution layers (RDLs).      to moving data between chips in    miniaturization [8-10]. Fabrication,
          For the megachip approach, the   a syst e m r at he r t h a n t he a ct u al   a s s e m b l y,  a n d  h e t e r o g e n e ou s
        thermal stability is improved by reducing   c om p ut i n g  [ 3 ] .  F u r t he r mo r e ,   integration are bridging the gap by
        the die-to-die (D2D) gap and increasing   traditional Moore’s Law scaling for   enabling economic use of the third
        the silicon content, allowing assemblers   developing next-generation devices   dimension (2.5D and 3D packaging).
        to mitigate the problem of mismatch   faces various challenges including   System-level i nteg rat ion is also
        in coefficient of thermal expansion   fabr icat ion of la rge r ch ip si z e s   emerging. These approaches include
        (CTE) for different substrates/modules   and associated yield improvement,   multi- die system- on- chip (SoC),
        integration schemes, which is important   development time, and cost scaling.   system-in-package (SiP), stacked die,
        for allowing the broad temperature range   This has forced the microelectronics   or package-stacking solutions.
        stability from reflow to operation at   indust r y to develop a number of   In addition to the trend toward
        room or even cryogenic temperatures.   alt e r nat ive a dva nce d pa ck ag i ng   miniaturization, new materials and
        Megachip tech nolog y facilit ates   architect u res and heterogeneous   structures are required to keep pace
        more space-efficient designs and can   i nt eg r a t io n t e ch nolog ie s [4]. A   with more demanding packaging
        accommodate  most  heterogeneous   modern packaging architecture needs   performance requirements. Wafer-
        dies without compromising stability or   to integrate multiple processor and   level packages (WLP), panel-level
        introducing CTE mismatch or warpage.   accelerator chips with minimu m   packages ( PLP), silicon /orga n ic
        A variety of heterogeneous chips were                                 i nt e r p o s e r s w it h r e d i s t r i bu t io n

                                                                                                             13
                                                          Chip Scale Review   January  •  February  •  2024   [ChipScaleReview.com]  13
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20