Page 40 - Chip Scale Review_November December_2022-digital
P. 40
Figure 5: Comparison of interface pitch between different interconnect technologies and the M-Series.
including that of well-known Cu pillar pitch, new interconnect technologies were die pad pitch can be further scaled to
flip-chip on laminate and Intel’s embedded developed such as Intel’s EMIB, which can 20µm, thereby achieving a more than 5X
2
interconnect bridge (EMIB) technology, achieve a die pad pitch of 45µm with an IO increase in IO density of 2518 IO/mm . Gen
2
as well as both existing Gen 1 M-Series density of 492 IO/mm . Our first-generation 2’s advanced LDI and automatic optical
and Gen 2, currently in development. M-Series with a planarized structure above inspection (AOI) equipment combined with
As shown in Figure 5, typical Cu pillar the encapsulated active die coupled with our patterning technology provides a path
flip-chip bonding has a die pad pitch of our patterning technology, achieved the for the ultra-high-density die pad pitch
2
100µm with an IO density of 105 IO/mm . same 45µm interface pitch as compared to and RDL density required for chiplets and
TSMC’s integrated fan-out (InFO) has a die EMIB, without the need for complicated advanced heterogeneous integration.
pad pitch of 55µm with an IO density of 314 bridge chips embedded in substrates [3- As previously discussed, a crucial
IO/mm [3]. To further decrease interface 5]. With the new Gen 2 technology, this advantage of M-Series over other chip-
2
Figure 6: M-Series and Adaptive Patterning enable a significantly larger via contact area given the same bond pad pitch and scaling to fine bond pitch.
38
38 Chip Scale Review November • December • 2022 [ChipScaleReview.com]