Page 50 - ChipScale_Nov-Dec_2020-digital
P. 50

Figure 8: “On-Off-On” iterative comparison study to validate the implementation of socket cleaning units built with functional features for maintaining and recovering
        the CRES stability during high-volume testing.
        devices that match the IC package   References                            to reduce cost of test and improve
        form factor. Upon deployment of the   1.  B. Patti, “Known not bad die    overall equipment effectiveness
        automated cleaning function, significant   success: repair, redundancy, and   (OEE),” BiTS, 2013.
        improvements in first-pass yield and total   pragmatism,”  Known Good Die   7.  J. Broz, S. Khavandi, B. Humphrey,
        test time are typically attained.      Workshop (KGD), 2020.              “ U n i q u e m e t ho d ol o g i e s fo r
          By “functionalizing” the cleaning   2.  D. Armstrong, “Shift left,” Known   investigating on-line cleaning
        devices and  surfaces  it  is  possible   Good Die Workshop (KGD), 2020.  process parameters and recipe
        to maximize the performance for      3.  J. Broz, G. Humphrey, “Controlling   optimization,” BiTS, 2014.
        contaminant particle removal for advanced   test cell contact resistance with   8.  B. Edington, “Yield and test time
        sockets. These process improvements    nondest r uct ive cond it ion i ng   improvement via automated online
        enable higher UPH metrics and reduce the   practices,” IEEE Burn-In Test Socket   cleaning,” BiTS, 2014.
        need for additional test hardware. Small   Workshop (BiTS), 2004.       9.  J. Broz, B. Humphrey, “Yield
        improvements in these key metrics will   4.  B. Gibbs, K. McNamara, “Auto   i m p r o v e m e n t a n d c o s t o f
        have immediate benefits for net revenue   contact cleaning engineering study   t e s t r e d u c t ion v ia aut om at e
        and lowered cost of test.              applied to package test,” IEEE BiTS,   cleaning,” SEMI-IEEE 11th China
                                               2007.                              Semiconductor Tech. Inter. Conf.
        Acknowledgements                     5.  J. Broz, B. Humphrey, “Consistent   (CSTIC), 2020.
          The authors would like to thank Alex   online test socket cleaning for first-  10. G. Roos, “Sockets get speedier, more
        Poles (ITS Applications Engineer)      pass yield stability and reduced   reliable,” EE-Times, Sept. 2003.
        and Brent Edington (for merly of       retest,” BiTS, 2012; Attendee Choice   11. B. Humphrey, J. Broz, “Innovative
        TriQuint Semiconductor), and other     Award.                             test contactor cleaning devices
        technical collaborators that have asked     6.  J. Broz, “Package test is a dirty   developed for floating base sockets,”
        to remain anonymous.                   business - Socket cleaning strategies   TestConX, 2019.



                       Biographies
                         Jerry Broz is SVP of Technology Development at International Test Solutions, Reno, NV. He received his
                       PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the U. of Colorado at Boulder. Prior to joining ITS in 2003, Dr. Broz
                       was Member of Technical Staff at Texas Instruments. He is an IEEE Sr. Member and a TWG Co-Chair for
                       the EPS-IEEE HiR Roadmap and serves as General Chair for SWTest and SWTest Asia Conferences. He has
                       numerous domestic and international patents and authored more than 125 technical papers and presentations.
                       Email: jerryb@inttest.net
                         Bret Humphrey serves as the Test Contactor Cleaning (TCC) Products and Applications Manager and as the
          TCC Operations Manager at International Test Solutions, Inc., Reno, NV. Since joining the company in 2005, he has worked in
          various capacities including Manufacturing and Operations Manager. He attended the engineering college at the U. of Wyoming.


        48   Chip Scale Review   November  •  December  •  2020   [ChipScaleReview.com]
        48
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55