Page 50 - ChipScale_Sep-Oct_2020-digital
P. 50

Why acceleration
                                                            models?
                                                              I n  r e li a b i li t y
                                                            tests, the most ideal
                                                            situation is to have
                                                            the test conditions
                                                            very close to the
                                                            us e (o p e ra t i ng)
                                                            c o nd i t i o n s.   where F o , R o , h o , x o , θ o , and β o  are the
                                                            However, because   life  distribution, reliability, failure
                                                            of time-to-market   rate, time-to-failure, characteristic life,
                                                            and  cost  savings,   and Weibull slope, respectively, at the
                                                            t h is   is   a l m os t   operating conditions.
                                                            impossible.  The    Linear acceleration. When η = 1, i.e.,
                                                            practical way is   linear acceleration [7]
                                                            to run accelerated               x o  = αx T
                                                            t e s ts  wi t h    then we have
                                                            increased intensity,             β o  = β T
                                                            a n d  re al i s t i c           θ o  = αθ T
                                                            sample  sizes  and
                                                            test times. (Most
                                                            reliability tests,
                                                            t h e re f o re ,  a re
                                                            accelerated tests.)
                                                            In this case, the
        Figure 8: Weibull plots of a 208-pin PQFP with 10% and 40% resistant change   p r i c e t o p a y i s   It can be seen that, for a linear
        failure criteria.
                                                            to constr uct the   acceleration (η = 1), the Weibull CDF
          Figure 8 shows the Weibull plots of a   acceleration factors to map (transfer)   plots of the operating condition and
        208-pin plastic quad flat pack (PQFP)   the failure probability, reliability   testing condition should have the same
        with a lead-free solder paste subject to   function, mean life, and failure rate   Weibull slope (i.e., the shape parameter
        - 40   125º C t her mal cycl i ng. A   from a test condition to the service   remains the same), and the characteristic
        computer stored all the resistance   operating (use) condition. Acceleration   life is different by a factor of the
        measurements. Let’s define one failure   models are needed for determining the   acceleration factor. It should be pointed
        criterion as 10% resistance increase and   acceleration factors [4,5,7].  out and emphasized that the same Weibull
        the other as a 40% increase. It can be   As mentioned earlier, the best-fit   slope is not an assumption but rather just
        seen from the Weibull plots that: 1) the   Weibull life distribution of a set of lead-  came out naturally for linear acceleration
        life distribution is many times different   free interconnects is     [7]. So, if two or more different test cells
        from the failure criterion based on the                                                                                                                                                  (with different temperature conditions)
        10% resistance increase and the 40%                                   of the same lead-free interconnects
        resistance increase; 2) for the same                                  yield very different Weibull slopes, then
        percent failures, the life taken from the                             either the linear acceleration model is
        failure criterion based on higher   whe r e  F T ,  x T ,  θ T , a nd  β T  a r e t he   not good (i.e., η ≠ 1), or the Weibull
        resistance increases is longer; and 3)     life distribution, time-to-failure,   distribution is not fitted with the test data,
        as expected, there are more failures with   characteristic life, and shape parameter   or both. Usually, the Weibull distribution
        the failure criterion based on lower   (or Weibull slope), respectively, under   adequately represents fatigue failures,
        resistance increases.              the test conditions. Let’s consider the   therefore, nonlinear acceleration models
          Another important factor affecting   following simple acceleration model   may need to be considered. All the papers
        the results of reliability testing is data   (transformation or mapping) [7]:  in the literature have been using the
        extraction. During tests, how many                                    linear acceleration, i.e., η = 1, or x o =αx T
        measurements should we take at each                                   or N o =αN T , where N o  = x o  and N T  = x T .
        cycle? It could be four measurements   where  x o   is  the  time-to-failure  at   In most solder joint reliability tests of
        or eight measurements. In order to   operating condition, α is the acceleration   integrated circuit (IC) packages on PCBs,
        avoid false failures, it is recommended   factor, and η is a real number larger than   the  luxury of running multiple thermal
        to compare the measurements of every   zero, e.g., 8.888. Then, we have  cycling conditions is not available (due
        channel at every two sequential cycles (no                            to the test time, chamber occupation,
        matter if it is four measurements or eight                            and manpower). Therefore, acceleration
        measurements). A three-cycle moving                                   models are required to predict the life
        average method is recommended. Please                                 distribution and failure rate of the
        read [5] for more details.                                            solder joints under anticipated service
                                                                              conditions. In the literature, for SnPb and


        48
        48   Chip Scale Review   September  •  October  •  2020   [ChipScaleReview.com]
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55