Page 20 - Chip Scale Review_May June_2023-digital
P. 20

Figure 5: The JMP predictive model for determining the best possible condition for a greater bottom-oxide etch rate than for the top-corner oxide.
        be spontaneous. The chemical etching of SiO 2  occurs after Si-O   TSV corner ER is attributed to the formation of the thick-
        bond breakage under the ion bombardment and,  therefore, Si in   passivation film. Figure 6 shows the typical passivation film in
        the broken bonds is scavenged by fluorine radicals. Therefore,   the absence of the bias power. The results show that there was
        a combination of high-energy ion bombardment and chemical   a thicker passivation film at the top than at the bottom of the
        etching are needed for oxide etching.                TSV. However, this thicker passivation film (silicon-fluorine
          ER process DOE trends are shown in Figure 5a, e.g, C 4 F 8    carbon) is not strong enough to withstand argon bombardment
        with the addition of argon results in bottom-oxide ERs being   and results in ineffective protection of the TSV top-corner
        lower than ERs for the top corner of the TSV. Without O 2  flow   oxide because of the low bond-breaking energy (~4.4eV) of C-F
        addition, it is observed that nearly a 30% faster ER is at the top   bonds in the film [13].
        corner. As the O 2  flow increases, the top-corner oxide ER slowly   When O 2  is added to the etch chemistry, the formation of
        drops and achieves the lowest reduction in ER observed at 30%   thick silicon-oxy-fluoride (Si-O-F) film results in a reduction
        of its normalized O 2 .                              of the oxide ER at the TSV’s top corner. The ER drops with
          At optimized DOE conditions, passivation film deposition   an increase in O 2  and achieves a maximum when O 2  flow
        is thicker at the top of the TSV than at the TSV bottom.   reaches 30% of the total C 4 F 8  gas flow. In addition to the thick
        Passivation deposition variation is caused because of the   passivation film, addition of O 2  also forms a volatile COF 2
        transport mechanism of polymer radicals, i.e., the convective   resulting in a reduced fluorine-free radical concentration.
        flow of constituent species controls the passivation film
        (silicon-oxy-fluorocarbon) deposition at the top of the TSV,
        whereas the diffusion flow controls the bottom of the TSV
        when the TSV aspect ratio >3. The reduction in the top


























                                                             Figure 7: A non-optimized run resulted in a higher top-corner oxide etch rate than for
        Figure 6: Passivation deposition at the TSV top corner.  the bottom oxide.

        18   Chip Scale Review   May  •  June  •  2023   [ChipScaleReview.com]
        18
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25