Page 39 - Chip Scale Review_May June_2023-digital
P. 39
Slipping IC package design schedules and
what to do about it
By Keith Felton [Siemens Digital Industries Software]
S everal factors are causing
advanced packaging design
schedules to slip to a perilous
degree. This article enumerates five
factors that cause increasing design
cycles and presents five workflows to get
around them and get IC packaging design
work back on track.
Designs are getting more complex
First, as with all semiconductor designs,
increasing complexity continues to create
new challenges for package design,
verification, and modeling. Packages
are now heterogeneous integration (HI)
platforms and are no longer simply a
connector between a chip’s IO pads or Figure 1: Offset hatched plans and multi-aperture outgassing.
bumps and a printed circuit board (PCB). metal plane areas to deliver power to 4-HI stacks with a total memory bus
The goal of an HI platform is to integrate, the die (Figure 1). These metal-filled width of 4,096 bits. Routing such a wide
connect, and optimize multiple dies plane areas are required to pass the bus and getting it within specification
together. These could include application- exacting fabrication requirements of can take a long time unless the design
specific integrated circuit (ASIC) logic, the substrate supplier and/or outsourced tool is capable of intelligent channel
chiplets, memory, voltage regulators, and semiconductor assembly and test replication, including the ability to update
discrete components that can be mounted (OSAT) supplier. Last-generation replicated channels due to any post-route
and interconnected into a single package package design tools struggle with edits typically caused by signal integrity
using high-speed, high-bandwidth complex filled metal areas, especially performance optimization (Figure 2).
chiplet-to-chiplet interfaces. The t hose w it h st r ict mult i-aper t u re
resulting HI assembly can deliver greater outgassing and area metal balancing Avoiding re-inventing or re-creating
performance at a reduced cost and higher rules, so they often apply workarounds design content
yield, with only a slightly larger footprint such as a “fast” mode to get over their Another area that can easily increase
than a traditional monolithic system on performance issues when creating mask- design time is lack of support for the
chip (SoC). There is also an emerging ready geometries. Of course, such “fast” reuse of known-good physical design
trend to include embedded logic, voltage modes are typically not manufacturing intellectual property (IP). Advanced
regulators, and capacitors within the ready/correct and usually must undergo packaging often has repeated structures,
package substrate. a post-process phase, or “smooth” complex via arrays, and areas of fanout/
As a result of the above developments, pass, which takes time, sometimes escape routing. Without an efficient
the first problem advanced packaging considerable time, further extending the way to define and reuse them, such as a
designers may face in dealing with design cycle. library element, designers face hours of
this complexity lays at the feet of their manual creation and editing—not just
existing legacy design tools—tools Shifting to high-bandwidth memory on their own design, but across other
developed for single-die organic laminate High-bandwidth memory (HBM) is designs as well.
ball grid array (BGA) designs. Often another new challenge when undertaking
companies must consider add-ons or high-performance computing package Use concurrent multi-designer
upgrades to new, expensive options. design, which includes datacenter devices, team design
artificial intelligence (AI) processors, Because advanced packages contain
Advanced substrates come with network processors, and virtual reality multiple heterogeneously-integrated
complex metal planes devices. HBM has exacting routing rules dies (aka chiplets), there is a significant
Many of today’s advanced package and requires a massively-parallelized increase in overall device size and
substrates require complex, filled interface, typically implemented as four complexity. These factors demand much
37
Chip Scale Review May • June • 2023 [ChipScaleReview.com] 37